Mounting Behavior in Dogs: Sex, Play, Arousal or Conflict?

1. What Mounting Is

1.1 A Motor Pattern, Not a Motive

Mounting is easy to recognize and hard to interpret. In the ethograms used in dog play research, a mount is coded when one dog rears up, keeps its hind legs on the ground and places its forelegs on the back of the other dog, with a rounded spine and the forepaws grasping the partner's torso. Pelvic thrusting may or may not be present (Ward et al., 2008). A second play study used almost the same definition and added that a mount is distinguished from a push or tackle by the rounded spine and by a distinct pause in the stable mount position, which may or may not be accompanied by thrusting (Kottferová et al., 2020). A recent review describes mounting as holding another dog between the front legs, typically from behind but occasionally from the front (Guimarães et al., 2026).

All three descriptions define a movement. None of them defines a motive. That is the central point of this article: the same motor pattern appears in sexual encounters, in play between puppies, in moments of excitement and, according to some authors, in socially tense situations. The question "why does my dog mount?" therefore cannot be answered from the movement alone. It has to be answered from the context, the target, the age and hormonal status of the dog and the response of the dog or person being mounted.

1.2 One Behavior, Several Contexts

The literature reviewed here allows mounting to be sorted into several contexts. There is a sexual context, in which males respond to females in estrus and estrous females may solicit or refuse mounting. There is a play context, in which mounting is part of the normal repertoire of puppies and young dogs. There are contexts of high arousal and possibly of social tension, for which the evidence is thinner and mostly interpretive. And there is mounting directed at people and objects, which owner surveys record as a separate item and which may be shaped by what happens afterward. A recent review summarizes this range: mounting can arise from factors beyond sexual behavior, including play and exploratory actions, and may be associated with stress or anxiety in some cases or reflect normal social behavior and elevated arousal in others (Guimarães et al., 2026).

These contexts are not mutually exclusive. A young intact male may mount in play, become sexually aroused during the mount and do so more often when excitement is high. The categories are a tool for observation, not a claim that each mount has one cause.

1.3 Why the Label Matters

How mounting is labeled decides what people do about it. Read as sexual, it points to castration; read as dominance, to "putting the dog in its place"; read as play or excitement, to managing arousal and the partner's comfort. The research supports each reading in specific situations and none as a general explanation.

2. Development: Mounting Before Puberty

2.1 Mounting in Puppy Play

Mounting does not begin with sexual maturity. In a longitudinal study of play among littermates, 19 puppies from four litters were videotaped across three periods: 3 to 8 weeks, 10 to 23 weeks and 27 to 40 weeks of age. Mounts were coded as one of the "offense" behaviors used in play. In the second period, mounts appeared for the first time, at 5% of offense and self-handicapping behaviors in the litters analyzed; in the third period, mounts became the most common offense behavior, followed by chases (Ward et al., 2008). The same paper describes social play in canids as including chasing, play fighting, inhibited biting and mounting behavior, which it characterizes as mimicking copulatory behavior.

A study of two German Shepherd litters, 14 puppies in total, coded mounting as one of the behaviors of the dog in the "winning" role during play at 7 and 9 weeks of age (Kottferová et al., 2020). The authors analyzed more than 1,200 dyadic interactions at each age and found symmetrical play in most of the litter and age combinations. They stress that the sample was too small to generalize to dogs in general or to the breed. How often mounting itself occurred at that age is not reported in the parts of the paper that could be checked, so the study only shows that mounting belongs to the coded play repertoire of young puppies.

Taken together, these observations place mounting in the normal development of dogs. A puppy that mounts littermates or toys is practicing a motor pattern that later becomes part of several behavioral systems.

2.2 Hormones Before and Around Birth

Mounting is nevertheless not hormone-independent, even in juveniles. The classic laboratory work on dogs distinguishes between hormonal effects that organize the developing nervous system and hormonal effects that activate behavior in the adult (how hormones and neurochemistry shape behavior). A recent review summarizes Frank Beach's work as showing that exposure to testosterone before birth can induce male-typical behaviors in female dogs, such as male urination postures and mounting, and that these behaviors can persist into adulthood without further hormonal influence (Beach, 1975, as summarized by Guimarães et al., 2026). The details of the original experiments could not be checked for this article and are not reported here.

A brain region involved in male sexual behavior offers a second line of evidence. In laboratory male dogs, lesions of the medial preoptic and anterior hypothalamic area made before puberty reduced the frequency of juvenile mounting and led to an almost total absence of male copulatory activity in adulthood, while urine marking and aggressive behavior were not affected. The dogs were allowed to interact with male peers during development (Hart & Ladewig, 1979). The lesion findings suggest that the studied brain region contributes to juvenile mounting and adult copulation; they do not establish a fully shared neural substrate or a general separation of all underlying circuits. Nor do they show that every juvenile mount is sexual.

Attraction to females in estrus also develops with age and hormones. In choice tests with male beagles, normal males first showed a reliable preference for visiting an estrous rather than a non-estrous female at 4 to 6 months. In normal males, attraction increased until 16 to 18 months while plasma testosterone rose, peaked at 10 to 12 months and then declined. Males castrated a few days after birth and treated with testosterone until 3 months showed the preference at 1 to 3 months, whereas untreated early castrates showed it only at 10 to 12 months and reached normal visiting times only after testosterone injections (Beach et al., 1983). This study measured visiting time, not mounting. It is relevant because it separates two things that are often merged: the motor pattern of mounting, which is present in puppies, and sexual interest in estrous females, which emerges and strengthens around puberty.

2.3 Adolescence

Adolescence is the period in which these two strands meet. In a Dutch owner survey, the proportion of intact males whose owners reported mounting was highest in dogs under 2 years (39%), lower in young adults (16%), adults (23%) and seniors (13%); in intact females, mounting did not differ by age (Roulaux et al., 2023). In a longitudinal cohort in which owners described undesirable behaviors in free text, "humping" was named by 22 of 1,718 owners (1.3%) at 6 months and by 1 of 684 owners (0.1%) at 18 months (Kinsman et al., 2025). The second figure does not measure how many dogs mount, only how many owners spontaneously listed mounting as a problem. This difference in spontaneous problem reports is consistent with an age-related decline but establishes neither its size nor a causal effect of puberty. The first study is cross-sectional; the second is a longitudinal cohort based on owner reports. Even repeated owner reports do not establish whether changes are caused by puberty, training or changes in the dog's environment (what changes during canine adolescence).

3. The Sexual Context

3.1 Males and Females in Estrus

The sexual context is the one in which the function of mounting is least controversial. An early chemical study identified methyl p-hydroxybenzoate in the vaginal secretions of females in estrus and reported that when the compound was applied to the vulvas of anestrous or spayed females, males became sexually aroused and attempted to mount (Goodwin et al., 1979). This was a single-compound claim from one laboratory, and the study should be read as early evidence that chemical cues from estrous females can elicit mounting attempts, not as the identification of a single trigger (what urine marks and odors communicate).

Females are not passive in this context. In a free-ranging population in India, estrous females selectively allowed some males to mate and even solicited them, but avoided other males or attacked them if they tried to mount (Pal et al., 1999, as summarized by Ward et al., 2008). For family dogs, the point is a simple one: even sexual mounting is a social interaction with two participants, and the response of the mounted dog matters.

3.2 Organization, Activation and Experience

Sexual mounting in adult males is supported by testosterone, but it is not simply switched on and off by it. The review by Hart and Eckstein, which is still the standard reference on gonadal hormones and problem behavior, describes roaming, urine marking and mounting as the classic hormone-responsive behaviors and notes that not all males change after castration (Hart & Eckstein, 1997). A recent review summarizes Beach's long-term castration studies as indicating that prior sexual experience may lessen the effect of castration on mounting (Beach, 1970, as summarized by Guimarães et al., 2026). Hart and Eckstein's review, by contrast, is cited for the statement that neither experience nor age at castration predicts which males will change. The question of whether sexual experience before castration protects mounting from the loss of testosterone therefore remains unresolved in the sources available here.

The distinction between organization and activation helps to explain why castration has different effects in different dogs. Early hormones shape how readily male-typical patterns are produced; adult hormones make them more likely in response to sexual cues; and learning shapes in which situations and toward which targets they occur (what testosterone does and does not do).

3.3 Females Mount Too

Mounting is often described as male behavior. The available surveys do not support a sharp sex difference. In the Dutch survey of 982 dogs, mounting was reported for 17% of dogs overall, for 25% of intact males and 17% of intact females; this sex difference was only a trend. Among intact females that mounted, 7 of 16 mounted more when in heat, which the authors note is a minority (Roulaux et al., 2023). The authors described mounting as "barely sexually dimorphic". In an online survey of 1,023 dogs, mounting or humping was reported for 19% of dogs, and male dogs had lower odds of mounting or humping than females (odds ratio 0.37), regardless of neuter status (Dinwoodie et al., 2021).

The two surveys disagree on the direction of the sex difference, and both rely on owner report and convenience samples. What they share is that a substantial proportion of females are reported to mount. The assumption that a mounting female must have a hormonal problem is not supported by these data (how males and females differ in behavior).

Large survey data on females point in the same direction. In a C-BARQ data set of 8,981 spayed females, the item "mounts objects, furniture, or people" was not significantly associated with age at spaying or with lifetime exposure to gonadal hormones (Starling et al., 2019). Whatever motivates mounting in females, it does not appear to track ovarian hormones closely in this measure.

4. Mounting in Play

4.1 Part of the Play Repertoire

In the play studies, mounting is coded alongside chin overs, stand overs, chases and forced downs. Both puppy studies classified it with the behaviors of the dog in the advantaged role (Ward et al., 2008; Kottferová et al., 2020). In the littermate study, the offense category was defined as behaviors used to maintain a dominant or superior position over a partner during play (Ward et al., 2008). This is a coding convention within play research. It describes who is on top in that moment of the game, not a status relationship that extends beyond the play bout.

Play itself is not a simple indicator of welfare or of harmony. A leading review concluded that play is neither a reliable nor a generalizable sign of positive welfare, but a heterogeneous behavior whose meaning depends on context, early experience and life history (Sommerville et al., 2017). The same applies to mounting within play: it can be part of a balanced game or a sign that one partner is overriding the other.

4.2 Role Reversal and Asymmetry

Play between dogs is often described as fair by default. The data are more varied. In a study of 55 dyads in a dog park, only 5.4% of dyads were balanced in winning and losing roles and 21.8% were completely asymmetric; older and higher-ranking dogs showed more offensive elements and less self-handicapping than their partners (Bauer & Smuts, 2007). Whether mounting was among the offensive elements in that study could not be verified. In the littermate study, males in mixed-sex pairs initiated play more often, showed more offensive behaviors toward females and also self-handicapped more (Ward et al., 2008).

For mounting, the practical consequence is that the question is not whether one dog mounts in play, but whether the roles shift, whether the mounted dog continues to engage, and whether the game includes pauses and signals that keep it playful (how play signals keep a game playful). Mounting in a game in which both dogs take turns being on top looks different from mounting in which one dog is repeatedly pinned and tries to leave.

4.3 When Play Mounting Stops Being Play

The studies cited so far coded play from video and did not test what happens when mounting becomes persistent. That gap matters for everyday life, where the more pressing question is often not mounting as such but a dog that will not stop mounting a playmate who clearly wants to be left alone.

In practice: In group play sessions and puppy classes, mounting tends to become a problem when it repeats in quick succession, when the same dog is always the one mounted, and when the mounted dog turns its head away, freezes, tries to sit down or snaps. These are observations from training practice, not findings from controlled studies, but they give a working rule: the response of the mounted dog decides whether intervention is needed, not the mounting itself.

5. Arousal, Conflict and the Dominance Interpretation

5.1 Mounting in High Arousal

Many owners report that their dog mounts when visitors arrive, at the start of a walk, after an exciting game or when meeting a group of dogs. The research base for this arousal reading is thin. No study in the sources for this article experimentally manipulated arousal and measured mounting. The arousal interpretation rests on indirect evidence: a review states that mounting can reflect elevated arousal levels and normal social behavior (Guimarães et al., 2026), and the authors of the largest male survey speculated that mounting of objects and people, which unexpectedly was more common in dogs with less hormone exposure, might be motivated by play or anxiety (McGreevy et al., 2018). Both are interpretations, not test results.

The arousal reading is nevertheless plausible within what is known about how excitement affects behavior. High arousal tends to make behavior less selective and more likely to spill over into whatever motor patterns are readily available (how arousal regulation works and can be trained). Mounting, which is practiced from puppyhood onward, is one such readily available pattern.

In practice: Many dogs that mount visitors do so in the first minutes after arrival and rarely later in the visit, and many dogs that mount during play do so after the game has been running at a high pace for some time. This pattern, observed in training practice and not tested in studies, suggests that lowering the overall level of excitement often reduces mounting more effectively than addressing the mounting directly.

5.2 Displacement and Social Tension

Some authors describe mounting as a displacement behavior, that is, a behavior performed in a context in which it seems out of place, under conflict or uncertainty. A recent review states that mounting may serve as a displacement behavior and may not necessarily be linked to sexual motivation (Guimarães et al., 2026). The Dutch survey authors mention a study in which anxious dogs mounted humans more than aggressive dogs did (Roulaux et al., 2023), but that primary study was not available for checking. The displacement reading is therefore a hypothesis that fits some observations, not an established finding in dogs.

The hypothesis is still useful because it directs attention to the situation: mounting that appears in a confined space, near a resource or during handling may be worth reading as a sign of tension. Whether it is can only be judged from the signals that precede and follow it (what the research says about calming signals).

5.3 The Dominance Interpretation

The most widespread lay explanation for mounting is dominance: the mounting dog is said to be asserting its rank. The interpretation has some historical basis in research practice. In the play literature, mounting is classified among the behaviors that put a dog in a "superior position" within the game (Ward et al., 2008). In an analysis of dominance indicators, the authors note that an earlier unpublished study by Bradshaw and colleagues had treated "mount", together with growling, staring and standing over, as a "confident" behavior presumed to indicate rank, but without testing whether it actually worked as a rank indicator (van der Borg et al., 2015).

When behaviors are tested systematically as status indicators, mounting does not emerge as one. In a kennel group of 16 intact dogs, the best formal dominance indicators were high posture and muzzle bite, the best submission indicators were body tail wag and low postures, and lowering of posture gave the most complete and nearly linear hierarchy (van der Borg et al., 2015). Mounting does not appear among the indicators identified. In a daycare group of 24 neutered dogs, submission was the most frequent, unidirectional and linear type of agonistic behavior and therefore a better indicator of status than aggression or dominance displays (Trisko & Smuts, 2015). Neither study supports the idea that mounting is a reliable sign of who ranks above whom.

The broader question of whether dominance is a useful construct for domestic dogs is still debated between research groups (Bradshaw et al., 2009; Schilder et al., 2014). That debate concerns relationships between dogs that can be measured through consistent, one-directional signals. It does not license the everyday leap from "he mounts" to "he wants to dominate", and it does not license the idea that dogs try to dominate people (why dominance as a training concept fails). How relationships develop among free-ranging dogs, with little human interference, is a separate question that the mounting literature reviewed here does not address (how free-ranging dogs organize their social lives).

6. Mounting People and Objects

6.1 What Surveys Record

Mounting of people, cushions, blankets or furniture is the form that owners find most embarrassing and most often report. In the C-BARQ questionnaire, it is captured by a single item: "mounts objects, furniture, or people". In 6,235 castrated males, longer lifetime exposure to gonadal hormones and later age at castration were associated with less mounting on this item (McGreevy et al., 2018). The authors found this surprising and pointed out that the item does not cover mounting of other dogs, which may be the main target in intact dogs. In other words, dogs castrated early were reported to mount objects and people more, not less. In females, the same item showed no significant association with age at spaying (Starling et al., 2019).

A shelter-based cohort of 1,842 dogs gonadectomized before 1 year found that early-age gonadectomy, compared with gonadectomy at the traditional age, was associated with an increase in "sexual behaviors" in both sexes (Spain et al., 2004). What this category contained, and whether it was mainly mounting, could not be verified from the abstract. Together with the C-BARQ data, it is a reminder that early castration does not reliably prevent mounting and may be associated with more of it in some measures.

6.2 Learned and Attention-Maintained Mounting

Mounting of people happens in a setting in which the person reacts: laughing, pushing the dog away, talking or scolding. Each response is attention, and for some dogs attention maintains behavior. No study in the sources for this article performed a functional analysis of mounting specifically. The principle has been shown for other repetitive behaviors: in functional analyses of dogs with stereotypic and compulsive behavior, owner-provided consequences maintained circling and licking in two dogs, while the movement of light maintained light chasing in two others, and changing the consequence reduced the behavior where it could be changed (Hall et al., 2015).

The transfer to mounting is an inference, not a finding, but it can be checked in the individual dog: if mounting of people occurs mainly when the dog is otherwise ignored and is directed at the person who reacts most, attention is a plausible maintaining factor (how attention can maintain behavior).

6.3 Compulsive and Medical Questions

Rarely, mounting or mounting-like behavior becomes repetitive, hard to interrupt and present in many contexts, including when the dog is alone. That pattern raises the question of a compulsive disorder, which requires a veterinary behavioral assessment and is discussed separately (how compulsive behavior is assessed). Mounting that is accompanied by frequent licking of the genital area, changes in urination, signs of discomfort or a sudden change in a dog that rarely mounted before is a reason to have the dog examined by a veterinarian. None of the studies reviewed here estimated how often such cases have a medical cause, so this is a recommendation for caution, not a statement about frequency.

7. What Castration Changes and What It Does Not

7.1 The Classic Owner Reports

Mounting is one of the behaviors most often given as a reason for castration. In the Dutch survey, it was the most frequently cited behavioral reason for desexing male dogs (31%), and it was rarely given for females (Roulaux et al., 2023). The expectation that castration helps rests largely on two older owner-report studies from the same research group.

In a retrospective study of 42 dogs castrated as adults, roaming, fighting with other males, urine marking in the house and mounting of other dogs or people were described as amenable to alteration by castration. Roaming was reduced in 90% of the dogs; the other behavioral patterns declined in one-half to two-thirds. The age of the dog at castration was not related to the effectiveness of castration. Mounting of other dogs or people was a concern in 15 of the dogs and declined in about two-thirds of them, rapidly in roughly one-third and gradually in another third, and some owners who reported a decline still noticed occasional mounting (Hopkins et al., 1976).

In a cohort study, owners of 57 male dogs castrated after 2 years of age because of at least one target problem behavior were interviewed by telephone. For urine marking, mounting and roaming, castration was followed by an improvement of at least 50% in at least 60% of dogs and by an improvement of at least 90% in 25 to 40% of dogs. For the other behaviors, including several forms of aggression, an improvement of at least 50% occurred in fewer than 35% of dogs. Improvement was not significantly correlated with the age of the dog or with how long the behavior had been present (Neilson et al., 1997).

The limits are substantial. The dogs were castrated because of problem behaviors, the outcome was owner recall, and there was no intact control group. Some improvement might have occurred without surgery, through maturation or management. And a sizeable minority of dogs did not improve by half.

7.2 Newer Prospective and Survey Data

Only one study in the sources followed dogs prospectively with a control group. In an Italian study, owners were interviewed before surgery and nine months later; 48 dogs were gonadectomized (15 males and 33 females) and 48 remained intact (17 males and 31 females). Gonadectomized dogs were reported to show less mounting, leash pulling and roaming at the second interview, while marking did not change in either group (Palestrini et al., 2021). The study was not randomized, the number of males was small, and the outcome was owner report. Whether the mounting result held separately for males and females could not be verified.

A retrospective online survey of 386 Polish owners of castrated males found that the proportion of dogs reported to mount fell from 55.4% before to 27.5% after castration, while fear of unfamiliar dogs or people and sound phobias increased (Kriese et al., 2022). The authors cautioned that owners might not have answered honestly when castration did not bring the expected result, and that the results should be treated with caution.

The Dutch cross-sectional survey offers a more restrained picture. Intact males were reported to mount more often than desexed males (25% versus 18%), but nearly one in five desexed males still mounted, and in females desexing made no significant difference. The authors concluded that mounting and roaming may not be as sexually dimorphic nor as easily influenced by desexing as often thought, and argued against using a reduction in mounting as a justification for routine desexing (Roulaux et al., 2023).

7.3 Hormone Exposure and the Wider Picture

The large C-BARQ analyses add a different dimension. In males, longer lifetime exposure to gonadal hormones was associated with less reporting of most unwelcome behaviors, including less mounting of objects and people; indoor urine marking and howling when left alone were the only behaviors more likely with longer exposure (McGreevy et al., 2018). In a web survey of 6,018 dogs, longer exposure to gonadal hormones, regardless of reproductive status, was associated with reduced odds of problematic and nuisance behaviors (Zink et al., 2023). These are cross-sectional associations in which hormone exposure is entangled with age, and they do not show that castration causes behavior problems. They do show that the expected behavioral benefit of early castration cannot be taken for granted.

A study on scent marking summarized the general expectation in the field as "castration appears to reduce frequency of sexually dimorphic behaviors, such as mounting and roaming" (McGuire, 2019). The studies reviewed here support a qualified version: in adult males, castration is often followed by less mounting, but the effect is partial, varies between dogs, is not reliably seen in females and does not address mounting that arises from play, arousal or learned consequences.

7.4 What This Means for the Decision

Castration is a decision with health, reproductive and behavioral consequences, and mounting alone is a weak basis for it (what neutering changes in behavior). The available evidence suggests three questions before surgery is considered for mounting: Is the mounting directed at dogs, especially at females in estrus, or at people and objects? Does it occur mainly in sexual contexts, or in play and excitement? Has the dog finished adolescence, given that mounting in intact males was reported less often in older dogs? A recent review concludes that, given the complexity of behavioral development, a general policy on gonadectomy for behavioral management is unsuitable and individual assessment is needed (Guimarães et al., 2026).

8. Reading Mounting in Context

8.1 Target, Timing and Body Language

Because mounting does not explain itself, observation comes first: Who or what is mounted? What happened just before? Is the body loose and bouncy or stiff? Is the dog visibly sexually aroused? Does it stop when the situation changes? These questions have not been validated as a diagnostic tool, but they cover the contexts the studies distinguish.

8.2 The Response of the Other Dog

The most important observation is the reaction of the dog being mounted. Many dogs tolerate brief mounting in play or ignore it; others stiffen, turn away, lick their lips, try to sit, move off or snap. These signals tell the observer more about whether intervention is needed than the mounting itself. The studies on play asymmetry show that unequal roles are common between dogs and not automatically a problem (Bauer & Smuts, 2007), but they did not measure the comfort of the partner.

In practice: When the mounted dog reacts with a clear but proportionate warning, such as a growl, a turn of the head or a brief snap without contact, and the mounting dog stops, many owners intervene too strongly and treat the warning as the problem. In practice, it is usually more useful to let a proportionate signal work and to intervene only when the mounting dog ignores it, when the mounted dog cannot get away or when the reaction escalates. This is guidance from practice, not a tested rule.

8.3 Households With Several Dogs

In homes with several dogs, repeated mounting of one dog by another can become a source of chronic tension, especially when the mounted dog is older, smaller, unwell or cannot avoid the other dog in tight spaces. Whether such mounting reflects play, arousal, sexual interest or tension has to be judged from the full context, and the dog being mounted needs ways to retreat (how competition and cooperation work in multi-dog households). The surveys reviewed here did not distinguish mounting within the household from mounting of unfamiliar dogs.

9. What Follows for Practice

9.1 Interrupt Calmly When the Other Party Is Uncomfortable

Mounting that both dogs accept in play does not need to be stopped. Mounting that the other dog or a person clearly wants to end should be interrupted, calmly and early: calling the dog away, stepping between the dogs, or taking the dog by its harness and leading it away for a short pause. The aim is to end the situation, not to teach the dog that mounting has dramatic consequences.

9.2 Redirect and Manage Arousal

Where mounting follows high arousal, the more effective lever is usually the level of excitement. Shorter play sessions with breaks, calmer greetings, a lead or barrier during the first minutes of a visit, and an alternative behavior that the dog can perform in exciting situations, such as going to a mat or carrying a toy, address the situation in which mounting arises. These measures follow from what is known about arousal and learning; their effect on mounting specifically has not been tested in controlled studies.

9.3 Avoid Reinforcing Attention-Driven Mounting

If mounting of people seems to be maintained by attention, the practical consequence is to make mounting less rewarding and other behavior more rewarding. That means no laughter, no long discussion, and a quiet, consistent way of ending the situation, combined with attention and activity for the dog at times when it is not mounting. The principle that consequences maintain behavior is well supported (Hall et al., 2015); its application to mounting in a particular dog has to be checked by observing whether the behavior changes.

9.4 Scolding and Pushing Off

Scolding a dog loudly or pushing it off forcefully often stops mounting in the moment, and many owners report that it works. The question is what the dog learns from it and at what cost. If the mounting arose from excitement, a startling reaction adds arousal rather than reducing it. If it was maintained by attention, a loud reaction is still attention. If it reflected tension, a harsh response may increase the tension and teach the dog that the person is unpredictable in exactly those situations in which it is already uncertain. And the dog does not learn what it could do instead. A calm interruption followed by a clear alternative achieves the same immediate result with fewer of these side effects.

In practice: Owners who switch from scolding to a calm, always identical interruption, followed by a short pause and an alternative behavior, often report that mounting becomes less frequent over the following weeks. This is an observation from practice and has not been measured in a study, but it is consistent with the principles of learning described above.

9.5 When to See a Veterinarian

A veterinary examination is advisable when mounting appears suddenly in an adult dog, when it is accompanied by genital licking, changes in urination, signs of pain or skin problems, when a male shows prolonged erection, or when the behavior is repetitive and hard to interrupt. If castration is being considered mainly because of mounting, the context of the behavior should be clarified first.

10. Summary at a Glance

Mounting is a motor pattern, defined in research ethograms as rearing up with forelegs on the partner's back and a rounded spine, with or without thrusting (Ward et al., 2008; Kottferová et al., 2020). It appears in puppy play long before puberty; in one littermate study it first appeared at 10 to 23 weeks and became the most common offense behavior in play at 27 to 40 weeks (Ward et al., 2008).

Early androgens shape how readily male-typical patterns are produced, and a brain region involved in male sexual behavior also supports juvenile mounting (Hart & Ladewig, 1979). Sexual interest in estrous females develops with puberty (Beach et al., 1983).

Females mount too. In owner surveys, 17% of intact females (Roulaux et al., 2023) and a higher proportion of females than males (Dinwoodie et al., 2021) were reported to mount. In intact males, mounting was reported most often in dogs under 2 years (Roulaux et al., 2023).

The dominance interpretation is not supported: when behaviors were tested as status indicators, posture and submission signals worked, and mounting did not emerge as an indicator (van der Borg et al., 2015; Trisko & Smuts, 2015). Arousal and displacement readings are plausible but rest mainly on reviews, author speculation and practice observation.

Castration is often followed by less mounting in adult males according to owner reports (Hopkins et al., 1976; Neilson et al., 1997; Palestrini et al., 2021; Kriese et al., 2022), but the effect is partial, varies between dogs and was not significant in females in one survey (Roulaux et al., 2023). Early castration was associated with more mounting of objects and people in a large survey (McGreevy et al., 2018).

11. Research Gaps and Critical Appraisal

11.1 Owner Report Dominates

Almost all data on mounting in family dogs come from owner reports: telephone interviews (Neilson et al., 1997), retrospective accounts (Hopkins et al., 1976; Kriese et al., 2022), online surveys (Dinwoodie et al., 2021; Roulaux et al., 2023; Zink et al., 2023) and standardized questionnaires (McGreevy et al., 2018; Starling et al., 2019). Owners notice and remember mounting selectively, especially when it embarrasses them, and owners who chose castration have an interest in seeing an improvement. The studies reviewed here mainly rely on owner reports of mounting in family dogs; no systematic direct longitudinal observation of the same family dogs was identified in these sources.

11.2 Small Samples and Missing Controls

The classic castration studies included 42 and 57 dogs and had no comparable intact control group (Hopkins et al., 1976; Neilson et al., 1997). The only prospective study with a control group included 96 dogs, of which only 15 were castrated males, and it was not randomized (Palestrini et al., 2021). The play studies included 19 and 14 puppies from four and two litters (Ward et al., 2008; Kottferová et al., 2020). The status studies observed one group each, of 16 and 24 dogs (van der Borg et al., 2015; Trisko & Smuts, 2015). These sample sizes are adequate for describing patterns but too small to estimate how common different forms of mounting are.

11.3 Definitions and Targets

The studies do not measure the same thing. Play studies code a precise motor pattern. Surveys ask about "mounting" or "humping" without definition, or, in the C-BARQ, only about objects, furniture and people. The Dutch survey did not separate targets at all. As a result, the striking contradiction that castration is followed by less mounting in some studies and early castration by more mounting in another may partly reflect different targets: mounting of dogs versus mounting of objects and people (McGreevy et al., 2018). Future studies would need to record target, context and the other party's response.

11.4 Females and Sex Differences

Mounting in females is understudied. The two surveys that compared the sexes disagreed on the direction of the difference (Dinwoodie et al., 2021; Roulaux et al., 2023), and the only figure linking female mounting to the cycle is based on 16 mounting females (Roulaux et al., 2023). The experimental work on early androgen exposure in females comes from laboratory beagles decades ago and could only be included here through a recent review.

11.5 Arousal, Conflict and Function

The interpretations most relevant to everyday life, mounting as a response to excitement, as a displacement behavior under tension and as attention-maintained behavior, have not been tested directly in dogs in the sources available. They rest on review statements (Guimarães et al., 2026), author speculation (McGreevy et al., 2018) and analogy with functional analyses of other behaviors (Hall et al., 2015). Observational studies that code arousal, context and partner responses alongside mounting, and single-case functional analyses of mounting directed at people, would close this gap.

11.6 Laboratory and Older Data

The hormonal and neural foundations come from laboratory dogs studied in the 1970s and 1980s (Beach et al., 1983; Hart & Ladewig, 1979). How strongly early hormonal organization shapes mounting in family dogs is not known.

12. Conclusion

Mounting is not one behavior with one meaning. It is a motor pattern that dogs practice from puppyhood, that hormones make more likely in sexual contexts, that appears regularly in play, that may increase with excitement and possibly under tension, and that can be maintained by human attention. Males and females, intact and neutered dogs mount. The popular reading of mounting as a dominance signal finds no support in studies that tested status indicators systematically.

According to owner reports, castration is followed by less mounting in many adult males, but not in all, not reliably in females, and not for mounting with little sexual motivation. For the individual dog, the useful questions are practical: whom the dog mounts, when, how the other party responds and what happens afterward. The answers usually point to calmer management, attention to the other dog's comfort and a clear alternative behavior.

Key Insights (Takeaways)

• Mounting is a motor pattern, not a motive: research ethograms define the movement, and its meaning has to be read from context, target and the other party's response (Ward et al., 2008; Kottferová et al., 2020).

• Mounting appears in puppy play long before puberty and became the most common offense behavior in play at 27 to 40 weeks in one littermate study (Ward et al., 2008).

• Hormones organize the brain systems for mounting early and make sexual mounting more likely after puberty, but they do not explain mounting in play or excitement (Hart & Ladewig, 1979; Beach et al., 1983).

• Females mount too: owner surveys report mounting in 17% of intact females in one study and more often in females than males in another (Roulaux et al., 2023; Dinwoodie et al., 2021).

• Mounting did not emerge as a status indicator when dominance indicators were tested systematically; posture and submission signals did (van der Borg et al., 2015; Trisko & Smuts, 2015).

• Castration was followed by at least 50% improvement in mounting in at least 60% of 57 adult males according to owners, but without a control group, and desexing made no significant difference in females in a later survey (Neilson et al., 1997; Roulaux et al., 2023).

• Early castration was associated with more mounting of objects and people in a large survey of males (McGreevy et al., 2018).

• In everyday life, a calm interruption when the other party is uncomfortable, management of arousal and an alternative behavior address mounting with fewer side effects than scolding.

References

Bauer, E. B., & Smuts, B. B. (2007). Cooperation and competition during dyadic play in domestic dogs, Canis familiaris. Animal Behaviour, 73(3), 489–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.09.006

Beach, F. A. (1970). Coital behavior in dogs: VI. Long-term effects of castration upon mating in the male. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 70(3, Pt. 2), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0028711

Beach, F. A. (1975). Hormonal modification of sexually dimorphic behavior. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 1(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4530(75)90019-0

Beach, F. A., Buehler, M. G., & Dunbar, I. F. (1983). Development of attraction to estrous females in male dogs. Physiology & Behavior, 31(3), 293–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(83)90190-7

Bradshaw, J. W. S., Blackwell, E. J., & Casey, R. A. (2009). Dominance in domestic dogs: Useful construct or bad habit? Journal of Veterinary Behavior, 4(3), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2008.08.004

Dinwoodie, I. R., Zottola, V., & Dodman, N. H. (2021). An investigation into the impact of pre-adolescent training on canine behavior. Animals, 11(5), 1298. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11051298

Goodwin, M., Gooding, K. M., & Regnier, F. (1979). Sex pheromone in the dog. Science, 203(4380), 559–561. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.569903

Guimarães, F. B., Barreto, R. O., & Apparício, M. (2026). Exploring behavioral outcomes of gonadectomy in pets: A need for personalized approaches. Animal Reproduction, 23(3), e20250125. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-3143-ar2025-0125

Hall, N. J., Protopopova, A., & Wynne, C. D. L. (2015). The role of environmental and owner-provided consequences in canine stereotypy and compulsive behavior. Journal of Veterinary Behavior, 10(1), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2014.10.005

Hart, B. L., & Eckstein, R. A. (1997). The role of gonadal hormones in the occurrence of objectionable behaviours in dogs and cats. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 52(3–4), 331–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(96)01133-1

Hart, B. L., & Ladewig, J. (1979). Effects of medial preoptic–anterior hypothalamic lesions on development of sociosexual behavior in dogs. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 93(3), 566–573. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077588

Hopkins, S. G., Schubert, T. A., & Hart, B. L. (1976). Castration of adult male dogs: Effects on roaming, aggression, urine marking, and mounting. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 168(12), 1108–1110. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.1976.168.12.1108

Kinsman, R. H., Casey, R. A., Tasker, S., Cooper, B., Giragosian, K., Harvey, N. D., Owczarczak-Garstecka, S. C., Samet, L., & Murray, J. K. (2025). Owner-perceived undesirable behaviours in young dogs and changes with age. Animals, 15(8), 1163. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15081163

Kottferová, J., Skurková, L., Mesarčová, L., Lešková, L., Demeová, A., & Jakuba, T. (2020). Friendship or competition? Symmetry in social play within the two packs of German Shepherd puppies. Animals, 10(9), 1627. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10091627

Kriese, M., Kuźniewska, E., Gugołek, A., & Strychalski, J. (2022). Reasons for and behavioral consequences of male dog castration: A questionnaire study in Poland. Animals, 12(15), 1883. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12151883

McGreevy, P. D., Wilson, B., Starling, M. J., & Serpell, J. A. (2018). Behavioural risks in male dogs with minimal lifetime exposure to gonadal hormones may complicate population-control benefits of desexing. PLOS ONE, 13(5), e0196284. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196284

McGuire, B. (2019). Effects of gonadectomy on scent-marking behavior of shelter dogs. Journal of Veterinary Behavior, 30, 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2018.11.002

Neilson, J. C., Eckstein, R. A., & Hart, B. L. (1997). Effects of castration on problem behaviors in male dogs with reference to age and duration of behavior. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 211(2), 180–182. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.1997.211.02.180

Pal, S. K., Ghosh, B., & Roy, S. (1999). Inter- and intra-sexual behaviour of free-ranging dogs (Canis familiaris). Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 62(2–3), 267–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(98)00220-2

Palestrini, C., Mazzola, S. M., Caione, B., Groppetti, D., Pecile, A. M., Minero, M., & Cannas, S. (2021). Influence of gonadectomy on canine behavior. Animals, 11(2), 553. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11020553

Roulaux, P. E. M., van Herwijnen, I. R., & Beerda, B. (2023). Desexing dogs as a means of decreasing the generally regarded sexually dimorphic behaviors of urine marking, mounting, and roaming. Journal of Veterinary Behavior, 62, 47–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2023.01.006

Schilder, M. B. H., Vinke, C. M., & van der Borg, J. A. M. (2014). Dominance in domestic dogs revisited: Useful habit and useful construct? Journal of Veterinary Behavior, 9(4), 184–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2014.04.005

Sommerville, R., O'Connor, E. A., & Asher, L. (2017). Why do dogs play? Function and welfare implications of play in the domestic dog. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 197, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2017.09.007

Spain, C. V., Scarlett, J. M., & Houpt, K. A. (2004). Long-term risks and benefits of early-age gonadectomy in dogs. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 224(3), 380–387. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.2004.224.380

Starling, M., Fawcett, A., Wilson, B., Serpell, J., & McGreevy, P. (2019). Behavioural risks in female dogs with minimal lifetime exposure to gonadal hormones. PLOS ONE, 14(12), e0223709. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223709

Trisko, R. K., & Smuts, B. B. (2015). Dominance relationships in a group of domestic dogs (Canis lupus familiaris). Behaviour, 152(5), 677–704. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568539X-00003249

van der Borg, J. A. M., Schilder, M. B. H., Vinke, C. M., & de Vries, H. (2015). Dominance in domestic dogs: A quantitative analysis of its behavioural measures. PLOS ONE, 10(8), e0133978. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133978

Ward, C., Bauer, E. B., & Smuts, B. B. (2008). Partner preferences and asymmetries in social play among domestic dog, Canis lupus familiaris, littermates. Animal Behaviour, 76(4), 1187–1199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.06.004

Zink, C., Delgado, M. M., & Stella, J. L. (2023). Vasectomy and ovary-sparing spay in dogs: Comparison of health and behavior outcomes with gonadectomized and sexually intact dogs. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 261(3), 366–374. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.22.08.0382